Highlights:

  • Companies gain the most from a DAST solution when they use it early in the software design lifecycle to identify potential weaknesses, especially in mission-critical applications.
  • Modern DAST tools are highly automated and provide a more comprehensive assessment of web application vulnerabilities. These solutions easily integrate into the SDLC and run transparently in the background.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) involves analyzing a web application from the front end to detect vulnerabilities through simulated attacks. This approach assesses the application thoroughly, emulating the actions of a malicious user. After the DAST scanner conducts these attacks, it examines the outcomes for unexpected results and identifies security vulnerabilities.

Necessity of Dynamic Application Security Testing

DAST is crucial because it allows developers to go beyond their individual knowledge while developing applications. Implementing DAST during the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) helps identify vulnerabilities in an application before public deployment.

Ignoring these susceptibilities and proceeding with deployment can lead to data breaches, causing significant financial losses and harming brand reputation. Human error is inevitable in the SDLC, and identifying vulnerabilities earlier makes them cheaper to resolve.

Integrating DAST into the Continuous Integration/Continuous Development (CI/CD) pipeline is known as “Secure DevOps” or “DevSecOps.”

DAST plays a pivotal role in optimizing web application security by proactively identifying discrepancies and misconfigurations. This ensures that your applications are fortified against potential threats before they reach production.

How DAST Enhances Web Application Security?

DAST tools actively seek out frailties in web applications, identifying weaknesses that attackers might exploit and demonstrating potential remote access points. They automatically alert relevant teams to address and prioritize remediation upon finding a vulnerability.

These tools enable businesses to monitor their web applications’ behavior, continuously revealing emerging flaws. By detecting risks early in the software development lifecycle (SDLC), companies can mitigate issues and save on costs.

Additionally, DAST tools assist with PCI compliance and other regulatory requirements. Companies may use the list of security risks as a compliance benchmark or assess and remedy the top challenges on this list at the request of third parties.

Apart from compliance, DAST tools help developers recognize configuration flaws and user experience challenges in web applications.

Recommendations for Dynamic Application Security Testing

To maximize the effectiveness of DAST in your security strategy, here are some key recommendations and best practices to consider.

  • Use DAST early and regularly for optimal results

Companies gain the most out of a DAST solution when they use it early to identify potential weaknesses, especially in mission-critical applications. Failing to implement DAST early can lead to higher costs, increased staff time, and frustration when addressing issues later in the process.

  • Collaborate effectively with DevOps

DAST tools help prioritize soft spots, but effective resolution requires seamless handoff to the DevOps team. Integrating DAST with your team’s bug-tracking system ensures developers receive the exact information needed to quickly address security issues, fostering a DevSecOps approach.

  • Use DAST as a comprehensive approach

While DAST provides timely insights into web application behavior in production, it is often combined with SAST and penetration testing for comprehensive security. Static Application Security Testing (SAST) identifies fragilities in source code early in the SDLC, while penetration testing simulates real-world attacks on specific applications.

As web application attacks increase, businesses recognize the importance of prioritizing security in the SDLC. Implementing a security scanner and following best practices for testing and remediation can significantly reduce risks and protect systems from attackers.

DAST tools come in certain forms, each tailored to address specific aspects of web application security, providing businesses with flexible solutions to meet their unique security needs.

Types of DAST tools

While DAST tools don’t have official subtypes, security experts often classify them into two informal categories: modern and legacy DAST tools. The key differences lie in their automation, integration capabilities, and security validation processes.

  • Legacy DAST

Legacy DAST tools generally lack advanced automation features, although their scanning process is automated. They primarily perform basic testing by sending requests, receiving responses, and making initial assessments, but they don’t provide full vulnerability validation, offering only lists of potential security issues.

  • Modern DAST

Modern DAST solutions are highly automated and offer a comprehensive examination of web application discrepancies. These solutions easily integrate into the SDLC and run transparently in the background.

Automation servers can trigger these tools and deliver scan results directly as tickets in a developer’s issue tracker. Some advanced DAST tools even offer proof of exploitation, saving penetration testers or security experts from the need for manual verification.

Understanding the variations of DAST tools provides valuable insight into their capabilities, which sets the stage for a clear comparison between DAST and SAST, two essential methods for comprehensive application security testing.

DAST Vs. SAST: Functional Patterns

DAST and SAST are the methods used to identify security exposures in web applications. While DAST evaluates applications in their production environment by simulating malicious attacks to detect security issues, SAST analyzes the source code to find vulnerabilities within the application.

Cybersecurity experts often recommend using both SAST and DAST to view potential glitches comprehensively. SAST tools, for example, can detect a variety of security flaws, such as SQL injection, buffer overflows, XXE attacks, and other risks that DAST might overlook.

SAST also promotes early testing during development, which helps to reduce security flaws in the source code, shorten development cycles, and enhance overall security posture.

Implementing DAST is crucial in enhancing your application’s security posture, as it allows for real-time detection and mitigation of susceptibilities.

How to Implement DAST Successfully?

Integrating DAST into your testing pipeline is more complex than adding SAST because DAST depends on the execution of your application. Although DAST can be automated, the automated steps must first be scripted or recorded, requiring a specific process after the tool is added to your pipeline.

  • Understanding users’ requirements

A good starting point for implementing DAST is to observe and document how users interact with your application. Record their actions and ask them to explain what they’re doing.

Users often forget their clicks and interactions because frequent actions become automatic. While this helps users focus on their tasks, subconscious actions can still lead to potential issues.

  • Automating user interactions

The next step is to use an automation tool to script the user’s actions. While this task may be easier for CLI and API applications compared to GUI applications, it is generally feasible for all types.

  • Integrating test scripts to CI/CD pipeline

Once you have automated interactions for the most critical use cases, you can execute these scripts while running a DAST tool to scan your application. After the initial DAST scan, you can begin addressing and fixing the identified security loopholes.

  • Adding regression tests to the testing suite

If you discover security shortcomings during your application’s daily use, you can incorporate specific usage scripts into your test suite. This helps ensure that these issues are not reintroduced in the future.

Concluding Words

While DAST is a valuable tool for detecting and responding to liabilities, relying on it alone won’t cover all your security needs. Sometimes, it may be the only option available, particularly when using niche programming languages or closed-source packages.

Running a DAST tool can be time-consuming, especially for tedious interactions. If you cannot automate these interactions, you will need to perform them manually before each release, which could take days or even weeks to complete.

Explore a curated selection of whitepapers on security designed to enhance your understanding with detailed analysis and comprehensive insights.