Highlights:

  • After obtaining a list of usernames and passwords, the cybercriminal’s objective is to systematically test them until discovering a successful combination. Typically, this process is automated using password spraying tools.
  • Active Directory password protection mechanisms effectively combat password spraying attacks through features like account lockout policies, complexity requirements, and anomaly detection.

As businesses endeavor to protect their sensitive data and systems, the significance of implementing strong cybersecurity measures cannot be emphasized enough. Amidst a myriad of sophisticated cyber threats, including password spraying, organizations worldwide face substantial risks.

This stealthy tactic, leveraged by today’s threat actors, involves manipulating password combinations using illicitly obtained database of usernames and passwords, further exacerbating the security landscape.

What is Password Spraying?

It is a tactic in which malicious actors systematically try to gain unauthorized access to numerous accounts by testing a small set of widely used passwords. Rather than bombarding a single account with various password attempts, this method involves trying a few common passwords across multiple accounts to find susceptibilities in the security defenses.

It’s a stealthier approach than traditional brute-force attacks, as it reduces the risk of triggering account lockouts or detection mechanisms by spreading the attempts across different usernames.

A password spraying attack is executed by attempting a few commonly used passwords against many user accounts rather than attempting many passwords against a single account. This method helps attackers avoid detection by most account lockout mechanisms.

How is Password Spraying Executed?

The deceptive credential tampering attack typically follows the three-step course comprising username and password extraction and then permuting and combining.

  • Accessing a list of usernames

Cybercriminals frequently initiate their operations by procuring lists of usernames, typically obtained from breaches across various organizations. It is estimated that the dark web hosts a staggering excess of 15 billion credentials available for purchase. Alternatively, these malicious actors might compile their lists, mimicking the formats commonly used for corporate email addresses.

Threat actors often opt for a targeted approach, focusing on specific groups within organizations, such as finance personnel, administrators, or top executives (the C-suite). This method often leads to more sophisticated password spray outcomes. They frequently target entities or departments that utilize single sign-on (SSO) or federated authentication protocols, allowing users to use one set of credentials across multiple services. Additionally, they exploit entities that are yet to implement multi factor authentication, which provides an extra layer of security beyond just passwords.

  • Extracting a list of common passwords

Password spraying attacks leverage collections of commonly used or default passwords. Discovering these passwords is relatively simple, as numerous reports or studies publish them annually.

Even Wikipedia maintains a page listing the top 10,000 most common passwords. Additionally, cybercriminals may conduct their own investigations to predict passwords. For instance, they might utilize the names of sports teams or notable landmarks in proximity to a targeted organization.

  • Trying out different combinations

After obtaining a list of usernames and passwords, the hacker’s objective is to systematically test them until discovering a successful combination. Typically, this process is automated using password spraying tools.

Scammers employ a single password across multiple usernames before moving on to the next password on the list. This tactic helps them evade lockout policies or IP address blockers, which restrict login attempts.

The repercussions of an attack can be devastating for companies, leading to compromised accounts, on-premise and cloud data breaches, and substantial financial and reputational damage.

How Password Spraying Impacts Businesses?

It poses a significant threat to SSO and federated authentication systems, which centralize access through a single set of credentials across various platforms or accounts.

In such scenarios, compromising just one account can swiftly cascade into the breach of multiple systems and business accounts. This domino effect not only compromises sensitive data but also undermines the overall security posture management of the organization, potentially resulting in financial losses, reputational damage, and regulatory non-compliance.

The distinction between traditional brute force attacks and the stealthier strategy of password spray attack underscores a fundamental shift in attackers’ methods and objectives.

Difference between Brute Force and Password Spraying Attacks

Password spraying and traditional brute force attacks differ in their methodologies. Brute force hazards involve systematically attempting various passwords for a single username, whereas password spraying technique involves trying a few commonly used passwords across multiple usernames. This distinction reduces the likelihood of triggering account lockouts and detection mechanisms, making password spraying a stealthier approach.

Furthermore, while traditional brute force attacks often target specific accounts or systems, password spraying script casts a broader net by simultaneously targeting multiple accounts or systems, increasing the potential impact for cybercriminals.

Detecting malicious activities requires robust and proactive cybersecurity measures to safeguard digital accounts and sign in from forceful unauthorized access.

How to Prevent Password Spraying? Robust Mitigation Techniques

Implementing reliable prevention strategies is paramount to safeguarding organizational assets and data integrity.

  • Strong password policy

By enforcing policies that mandate the use of strong passwords containing a mix of alphanumeric characters and symbols, IT teams can significantly reduce the susceptibility of their systems to such malicious activities.

  • Active directory password protection

Active directory security mechanisms effectively prevent password spraying through features like account lockout policies, complexity requirements, and anomaly detection. By restricting the number of failed login attempts, mandating robust password configurations, and flagging unusual login behaviors, these defenses bolster the resilience of authentication systems.

  • Login detection

IT teams should additionally deploy detection mechanisms to identify instances where multiple login attempts across various accounts originate from a single host within a condensed timeframe. Such patterns serve as conspicuous indicators of password spraying attempts.

  • Robust lockout policies

Establishing an appropriate lockout policy at the domain level is crucial in password spraying prevention. This policy must find a balance: it should be stringent enough to deter attackers from multiple authentication attempts within the lockout period yet lenient enough to prevent legitimate users from being locked out due to minor mistakes.

  • Zero-trust approach

At the core of zero-trust application access lies the principle of granting permission solely to necessary resources essential for current tasks. Embracing zero trust within an organization significantly bolsters network security, marking a pivotal stride toward safeguarding digital assets.

  • Unusual username conventions

Steering clear of predictable usernames such as ‘ben.parker’ or ‘bpark,’ which are commonly targeted by attackers, is advisable, particularly outside of email contexts. Employing distinct and non-standardized logins for single sign-on accounts presents a viable strategy to detect password spraying.

  • Biometrics

Some organizations enhance security by implementing biometric authentication and verification, which prevents unauthorized access, as attackers cannot log in without the individual’s physical presence.

  • Password manager

Password managers generate and store complex, lengthy passwords, reducing the risk of breaches. They alleviate the need to memorize multiple login details and can identify password duplicates across various services, offering a convenient solution for individuals to enable password spraying detection and manage their credentials securely.

  • Multi factor authentication (MFA)

MFA adds an extra layer of authentication beyond the username/password combo, thwarting unauthorized access. Even if a user employs a weak password, a streamlined multi factor authentication prevents breaching by mandating a second authentication factor, rendering password stuffing attacks ineffective.

  • Passwordless authentication

Passwordless authentication removes the need for passwords, employing biometrics or email/SMS verification methods. It’s touted as the future of authentication by experts due to its ability to eradicate unsafe password practices, thus mitigating credential-based attacks.

Closing Thoughts

Password spraying represents a formidable threat to organizations seeking to protect their digital assets and sensitive information. By understanding how modern-day attacks work and implementing robust cybersecurity and business strategies, organizations can fortify their defenses and reduce the likelihood of falling victim to stealthy attack techniques. With a proactive approach to cybersecurity, businesses worldwide can stay one step ahead of cyber adversaries and safeguard their valuable resources.

Our extensive collection of carefully curated whitepapers on Security can assist you in enhancing your expertise and proficiency through insightful evaluations.